top of page

The Missing Link Between Psychological Safety and Constructive Feedback

  • Writer: Elizabeth Eldridge
    Elizabeth Eldridge
  • 8 hours ago
  • 6 min read

We’ve all been there.


You get a piece of feedback in a meeting or a one-on-one… and suddenly your brain goes into overdrive.


Did I mess up?

Are they upset with me?

Is this a bigger issue than they’re saying?

Are they questioning my abilities?


Your body tightens. Your thoughts start racing. You replay the conversation over and over.

And in that moment, it can feel uncomfortable… sometimes even threatening.


But in reality, feeling defensive when you receive feedback doesn’t automatically mean you’re psychologically unsafe.


It means you’re human.


At the same time, psychological safety does matter — deeply.


Because for feedback to actually be useful (and not avoided, misinterpreted or taken personally) people need to feel safe enough to:


  • hear it

  • question it

  • reflect on it

  • and act on it


And that’s where many workplaces get stuck. We talk about psychological safety. We talk about feedback. But we don’t always talk about the skill that connects the two: Feedback literacy.

 


So What Are We Missing?


Feedback literacy is the ability to:


  • give feedback clearly and respectfully

  • receive feedback without immediately going into defence mode

  • interpret feedback without assuming the worst

  • use feedback as a tool for growth instead of a measure of worth


While feedback literacy includes how we give feedback, one of the biggest gaps in today’s workplaces is our ability to receive and process it.


We’ve been taught how to do our jobs. We’ve been taught how to meet expectations. But very few of us were ever taught how to navigate feedback itself. And in today’s workplaces, that gap shows up everywhere.

 


The Problem Isn’t Feedback; It’s Our Relationship With It


Many organizations have a culture where:


  • Feedback feels risky to give

  • Feedback feels personal to receive

  • Leaders hesitate to say the hard things

  • Employees interpret feedback as judgment instead of information


So feedback becomes inconsistent… or disappears altogether.


Then we hear things like:


  • “No one tells me what I need to improve”

  • “I wish I had known sooner”

  • “It doesn’t feel psychologically safe here”


But often, what’s missing isn’t feedback itself. It’s the ability to navigate it.

 


Why Feedback Feels So Personal


There’s a reason feedback hits the way it does. Our brains are wired to detect threats, especially social ones.


If you’ve ever been in a training session with me, you’ve probably heard me talk about social health, and how our need for connection, inclusion and belonging isn’t just a “nice to have.” It’s a basic biological necessity. We’re hardwired for it.


Thousands of years ago, being excluded from the group wasn’t just uncomfortable. It was dangerous. Belonging (being part of a pack) equated to better odds of survival. So our brains became highly sensitive to anything that might signal rejection, disapproval or loss of status.


Fast forward to today, and that same wiring is still at work. So when someone points out a gap, an error or an opportunity to improve, your brain doesn’t always hear, “Here’s something to work on.”


Instead it hears:


“Something’s wrong with you.”

“You’re not meeting expectations.”

“You might not belong here.”


That’s when your brain can start to shift into a threat response.


The amygdala (the part of the brain responsible for detecting danger) becomes activated. It doesn’t take much. Even well-delivered, respectful feedback can be interpreted as a social threat if the brain senses risk to identity, competence or belonging.


When that happens, your body can move into a familiar pattern directly linked to the survival instinct:


  • fight (defensiveness, arguing, justifying)

  • flight (withdrawing, shutting down, avoiding)

  • freeze (blanking, overthinking, not knowing what to say)


At the same time, the prefrontal cortex (the part of your brain responsible for reasoning, perspective-taking and problem-solving) becomes less active. In other words, the part of your brain you need most in that moment is the part that goes a little offline.


That’s why feedback can feel so overwhelming, even when logically you know it’s not a big deal.


Cool, huh? I’ve always been fascinated by how much of our behaviour today has easy-to-trace roots that go straight back to our biological instincts. Sometimes understanding why our brain responds to experiences a certain way helps us to make sense of thoughts and feelings.


Ok, let me get back on topic: without feedback literacy, that reaction you have in the moment can quickly spiral into:


  • overanalyzing the interaction

  • questioning your abilities

  • assuming negative intent

  • replaying the conversation long after it’s over


But that reaction isn’t a sign of weakness. It’s a sign of wiring. Again, you’re human! It’s a response that, based on our biology, makes perfect sense but isn’t a fun way to feel. So, we’ve got to learn to work with it.


When people build feedback literacy, they start to recognize that initial reaction for what it is — a fast, protective response — and create space before acting on it.


That pause is where everything changes. It’s where defensiveness can turn into curiosity.It’s where assumptions can turn into questions. It’s where feedback becomes something that’s actually useful.

 


When We Confuse Discomfort With Harm


One of the biggest shifts happening in workplaces right now is how we interpret discomfort. We’ve done important work to reduce harmful behaviours like bullying, harassment and disrespect. But somewhere along the way, the line started to blur.


Not all discomfort is harmful.


In fact, some discomfort is a natural part of:


  • learning

  • growth

  • accountability

  • honest conversations


The goal isn’t to eliminate discomfort from the workplace. The goal is to ensure that discomfort is:


  • respectful

  • specific

  • focused on the work, not the person


When we treat all discomfort as unsafe, we risk avoiding the very conversations that help people grow.

 


The Cost of Avoiding Feedback


When feedback is avoided in the name of keeping things comfortable, it creates a different kind of problem:


  • Issues go unaddressed

  • Expectations stay unclear

  • High performers feel overlooked

  • Teams operate on assumptions instead of clarity


Over time, that lack of clarity erodes trust. People don’t feel safer when nothing is said. They feel uncertain. And uncertainty is rarely a space where people do their best work.

 


Feedback Literacy Is a Shared Responsibility


This isn’t just a leadership issue. It’s not just an employee issue either. It’s a shared skill set that needs to be built across the organization.


Leaders need to:


  • Be clear, direct, and respectful

  • Avoid over-softening to the point of confusion

  • Model how to receive feedback themselves


Employees need to:


  • Stay open, even when feedback feels uncomfortable

  • Ask questions instead of jumping to conclusions

  • Separate their identity from their performance


Psychological safety isn’t about removing feedback. It’s about creating the conditions where feedback can be given and received in a way that’s constructive.

 


Start Small Strategies


You know I’m all about practical approaches broken down into bite-sized pieces! If this is feeling like a big shift, start small. Here are some specific strategies you can implement right away to improve your feedback literacy:


  1. Normalize feedback as part of everyday work

Not just formal reviews or difficult conversations.


  1. Ask for examples

Clarity reduces defensiveness.


  1. Pause before reacting

Give yourself a moment to process before responding.


  1. Focus on the work, not the person

Both when giving and receiving feedback.


  1. Talk with your team and colleagues about how they prefer to give and get feedback

There’s no one-size-fits-all approach.

 


Final Thoughts


Psychological safety and feedback aren’t competing priorities. They depend on each other. Without psychological safety, feedback feels threatening. Without feedback literacy, even safe environments can feel uncomfortable.


But when both are in place, feedback becomes clearer, conversations become more honest and people are able to grow without it coming at the cost of their confidence.

At the end of the day, if feedback feels like a threat, people will avoid it. If it feels safe enough to engage with, it becomes one of the most powerful tools we have for growth.

 


Elizabeth Eldridge is a Psychological Health & Safety Consultant based in southern New Brunswick, Canada. In addition to keynote speaking, event emceeing, consulting services and corporate training on mental health in the workplace, she supports organizations across the country on the adoption of Canada's best practice guidelines on psychological health and safety management. She is the Founder & President of Arpeggio Health Services which provides standardized education programs like Mental Health First Aid, The Working Mind, QPR Suicide Prevention and more.


Comments


bottom of page