When Psychological Safety Gets Weaponized

Elizabeth Eldridge
13 minutes ago
5 min read

Psychological safety has become one of the most important and widely referenced concepts in today’s workplaces. And rightly so. When done well, it creates environments where people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes and contribute without fear of humiliation or retaliation.

But lately, I’ve been noticing a troubling trend. I had an intriguing conversation with a colleague earlier this week and learned that she’d been seeing and hearing some of the same.

The term psychological safety is increasingly being misused. In some cases, it’s being weaponized.

And if that feels familiar, it’s because we’ve seen this pattern before.

When Awareness Turns Into Overcorrection

Years ago, when bullying and harassment became front-and-centre workplace issues, it was long overdue. Many employees were experiencing real psychological harm and finally had language, policies and processes to address it.

But as awareness grew, the pendulum swung hard.

I’ve observed, encountered and been called in to provide support in workplace situations where respectful, appropriate performance management was labelled as bullying simply because it felt uncomfortable. A supervisor raised concerns about missed deadlines. A leader gave corrective feedback. A manager addressed behaviour that needed to change.

It wasn't aggressive, demeaning or personal.

But because the employee felt embarrassed, defensive or disagreed with the feedback, the word bullying was used to describe the experience.

Not because bullying was happening, but because discomfort was.

Now, I’m seeing the same thing happen with psychological safety.

Discomfort Does Not (Necessarily) Equal a Lack of Psychological Safety

Let’s pause here and be very clear.

Feeling uncomfortable at work does not automatically mean you are in a psychologically unsafe environment.

Work involves challenge. Growth involves friction. Learning involves mistakes. And leadership involves conversations that won’t always feel good in the moment.

Healthy teams can hold tension. They can have hard conversations. They can disagree and still feel safe. In my view, psychological safety actually requires some degree of discomfort on occasion. Without it, we never get the chance to practice respectful conflict resolution or learn how to manage tough emotions at work.

A psychologically safe workplace isn’t one where everyone feels good all the time. It’s one where people feel safe enough to engage, even when things feel hard.

How Psychological Safety Gets Weaponized

Weaponization happens when a concept designed to protect people is used to avoid accountability, shut down dialogue or silence leadership.

Here are some real-world examples I’ve seen firsthand or heard about:

A leader respectfully addressing performance concerns is accused of creating a psychologically unsafe environment
Clear expectations and boundaries are framed as harmful or threatening
Necessary conversations are labelled unsafe simply because they trigger emotional discomfort
The language of psychological safety is used to deflect feedback rather than reflect on it

In these moments, psychological safety stops being a shared responsibility and becomes a shield.

And that’s where problems begin.

Because when leaders become afraid to lead, feedback disappears. Expectations become vague. Performance issues go unaddressed. And ironically, true psychological safety starts to erode.

What Psychological Safety Actually Is (And Is Not)

Let’s reset the definition.

Psychological safety means:

You can speak up without fear of ridicule or retaliation
You can ask questions without being made to feel small
You can make a mistake without being shamed
You can disagree respectfully
You can receive feedback without it becoming personal or punitive

Psychological safety does not mean:

You’re protected from all discomfort
You never feel challenged
You never experience disagreement or conflict
You’re immune from feedback
Your ideas can’t be questioned
Accountability disappears

If the goal were comfort at all costs, learning and development would come to a standstill.

Psychological safety isn’t about avoiding hard moments. It’s about being able to move through them without fear.

Psychological Safety Is a Shared Responsibility

This is the part that doesn’t get nearly enough attention.

Psychological safety is not something leaders simply provide. It’s something teams actively co-create. That means everyone has a role to play in maintaining it.

A psychologically safe workplace is not one where people avoid hard conversations. It’s one where those conversations can happen respectfully, without fear of humiliation or retaliation.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Psychological safety works best when there is clarity around responsibility on both sides of the conversation.

Leaders contribute to psychological safety by:

Communicating with respect and clarity
Separating behaviour from personal worth, focusing on actions rather than identity or belief systems
Setting and communicating expectations transparently, even when those expectations may be unpopular
Inviting input and respectful dissent while still holding the line on standards
Addressing performance issues early and constructively, rather than letting frustration build
Staying calm and regulated during difficult conversations, modelling that discomfort can be handled in healthy ways

Psychological safety doesn’t require leaders to tiptoe. It requires them to be fair, clear and consistent.

Employees contribute to psychological safety by:

Tolerating reasonable discomfort as part of growth and learning
Distinguishing between harm and challenge
Approaching feedback with curiosity rather than defensiveness
Engaging in conversations in good faith, not using language to shut them down
Reflecting on what might be learned, not just how an interaction felt

Psychological safety isn’t a guarantee that work will always feel comfortable. It’s an agreement that people will be treated with respect, even when the message is hard to hear.

A workplace where no one is ever challenged isn’t psychologically safe… it’s fragile.

And a workplace where leaders are afraid to speak honestly isn’t healthy… it’s avoidant.

Safeguarding Psychological Safety in Practice

Here are a few grounded ways organizations can protect the integrity of psychological safety without losing accountability:

Normalize Discomfort as Part of Growth

Make it explicit that feeling uncomfortable doesn’t mean something is wrong. It often means learning is happening.

Build Feedback Literacy

Teach people how to give and receive feedback without catastrophizing it or taking it personally.

Be Clear About Behaviour vs. Harm

Not every difficult interaction is harmful. Distinguish between poor conduct and uncomfortable conversations.

Support Leaders, Don’t Silence Them

Leaders need permission and skill to have courageous conversations, not fear of being labelled unsafe for doing their job.

Use Language Carefully and Consistently

Overusing or misusing important terms weakens their impact when real harm occurs.

Provide Education and Training

Invest in training that helps both leaders and employees understand what psychological safety actually is, what it’s not and the role each person plays in fostering it day to day. (I can help!)

Rebalancing the Pendulum

Just like we had to refine our understanding of bullying over time, we now need to do the same with psychological safety.

That means holding two truths at once:

Psychological safety is essential and worth protecting
Discomfort, disagreement and accountability are not the enemy

Psychological safety was never meant to eliminate tension. It was meant to make honest, human interaction possible.

If we want workplaces that are both compassionate and functional, we need to protect the meaning of the concept, not dilute it.

Because when everything is labelled unsafe, nothing is.

And when psychological safety becomes a weapon, everyone loses.

Elizabeth Eldridge is a Psychological Health & Safety Consultant based in southern New Brunswick, Canada. In addition to keynote speaking and corporate training on mental health in the workplace, she supports organizations across the country on the adoption of Canada's best practice guidelines on psychological health and safety management. She is the Founder & President of Arpeggio Health Services which provides standardized education programs like Mental Health First Aid, The Working Mind, QPR Suicide Prevention and more.